Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-04 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and White | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a general score of 90.5, which is a little bit better than Galaxy Z Flip's 88.5 general score. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has Android operating system, while Galaxy Z Flip counts with Android 12 operating system. Although it's the best cellphone in this comparison, we must note that it is also heavier and somewhat thicker.
The Galaxy Z Flip counts with just a bit better processing power than Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have a same size display, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels and a quite higher pixels number per screen inch.
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a superior camera than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos and videos and worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a much more megapixels camera and a lot bigger sensor which offers a much higher image and video quality.
The Galaxy A90 5G features a bit more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Galaxy A90 5G features greater battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.