Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android | -- |
| 2019-09-04 | 2019-01-15 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue and Red |
| Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 13.18 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A90 5G is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, having a 90.5 score against 80.3. Although it's the best in this comparison review, the Galaxy A90 5G design is a little heavier and a bit thicker than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7. Galaxy A90 5G counts with a bit faster processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A90 5G also has more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 both count with very similar screens, because although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 has a bit smaller screen and a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a little greater pixel quantity per inch of screen. Galaxy A90 5G has a bit more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A90 5G also has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features a bit better battery performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because it has a 13% greater battery capacity. Galaxy A90 5G takes slightly better photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light photos and videos, and they both have a same resolution back-facing camera and a 0.5 inches sensor, the Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a much better video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.