Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android | Android 10 |
| 2019-09-04 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black and White | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has an overall score of 90.5, which is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's global score of 81.1. Even when Samsung Galaxy A90 5G and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro were released with only a few months difference, Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is a little bit lighter and a little thinner. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with Android operating system, while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro works with Android 10 operating system.
The Galaxy A90 5G counts with a bit sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro. Both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, a same size display and the same quantity of pixels per inch of display. The Galaxy A90 5G features a little better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro. They have a Octa-Core processing unit and 6 GB of RAM memory.
Galaxy A90 5G counts with much more memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have an external memory card slot that supports up to 512 GB, the Galaxy A90 5G also has 64 GB more internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a bigger aperture, a way higher resolution camera in the back and a bigger camera sensor capturing higher quality pictures.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with just a little bit longer battery life than Galaxy A90 5G, because it has a 12% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.