Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Ace 3
3G Only Dual SIMGT-S7272
Motorola DROID Turbo
64 GB| Global Score | |
| 60.8 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.2.2 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2013-06-10 | 2014-10-28 |
| 4.77 x 2.47 x 0.39 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 4.06 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black | Black and Blue |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 233 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.6 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Broadcom BCM21664 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Dual-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Broadcom VideoCore IV (250 MHz) GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 7.83 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 4.26 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.71 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.9 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo has a global score of 77.9, which is a lot better than Galaxy Ace 3's global score of 60.8. The Motorola DROID Turbo design is newer, but way heavier and somewhat thicker than the Galaxy Ace 3. Both devices in our current comparison have Android operating system, but Motorola DROID Turbo has 4.4.4 version and Galaxy Ace 3 has Android 4.2.2 version, providing the user a couple nice extra features.
The Motorola DROID Turbo has a much sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Ace 3, because it has a much better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution, a way higher amount of pixels per inch in the display and a bigger screen. The Motorola DROID Turbo features a really superior hardware performance than Galaxy Ace 3, because it has a much better graphics processing unit running at 500 megahertz, more cores and 2 GB more RAM.
Motorola DROID Turbo takes greater videos and photos than Galaxy Ace 3, because it has a back-facing camera with a lot better 20.7 mega pixels resolution and a much better video quality. The Motorola DROID Turbo has much more memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Ace 3, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory capacity.
Motorola DROID Turbo features a much longer battery performance than Galaxy Ace 3, because it has a 160% larger battery size.
Motorola DROID Turbo is a little more expensive than Samsung Galaxy Ace 3, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.