Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Ace 3
3G Only Dual SIMGT-S7272
| Global Score | |
| 60.8 | 66 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.2.2 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2013-06-10 | 2018-05-01 |
| 4.77 x 2.47 x 0.39 inches | 6.12 x 2.84 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.06 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black | Gray |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | $ 120.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 1440 x 720 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 233 pixels per inch | 282 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 7.1 |
| Performance | |
| Broadcom BCM21664 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Dual-Core 1000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Broadcom VideoCore IV (250 MHz) GPU | Adreno 308 GPU |
| 7.83 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.26 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.71 | 8.36 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.9 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto E5 is just a bit better than the Galaxy Ace 3, with a score of 66 against 60.8. Both devices we are comparing use Android OS (operating system), but the Moto E5 has newer 8.0 Oreo version while Galaxy Ace 3 has Android 4.2.2 version, providing the user a couple additional features and optimized performance. The Moto E5 body is incredibly newer and thinner than the Galaxy Ace 3's, but it's extremely heavier.
Motorola Moto E5 features a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy Ace 3, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with a greater number of cores and a greater amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 counts with a little more vivid display than Motorola Moto E5, although it has a little bit inferior pixels count in each inch in the display, a much smaller screen and a way worse resolution of 800 x 480px.
The Moto E5 features a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy Ace 3, because it has a back facing camera with much more megapixels and a lot better (Full HD) video definition. The Moto E5 counts with a much better memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Ace 3, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 128 GB and more internal memory capacity.
Motorola Moto E5 has a very superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Ace 3, because it has a 167 percent greater battery capacity.
The Moto E5 is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheaper than the other phone, making it easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.