Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Ace 4
3GSM-G357FZ
Motorola DROID Turbo
64 GB| Global Score | |
| 60.7 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2014-06-30 | 2014-10-28 |
| 4.78 x 2.48 x 0.43 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 4.37 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and Blue |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 130.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 217 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.5 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 8916 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Dual-Core 1000 MHz processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 306 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 7.92 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 4.26 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.82 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 11 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo is a lot better than the Samsung Galaxy Ace 4, getting a global score of 77.9 against 60.7. Although it's the best in this comparison, we must tell that it is also a noticeably heavier and a bit thicker cellphone. Both phones we are comparing here work with Android OS, but Motorola DROID Turbo has a more recent 4.4.4 version and Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 has Android 4.4.
Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a much more vibrant display than Galaxy Ace 4, because it has a bigger display, way more pixels per inch in the screen and a much higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px. Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a really superior processing power than Samsung Galaxy Ace 4, because it has a much better graphics processor, a greater number of cores (and they are faster) and 2,5 GB more RAM.
The Motorola DROID Turbo takes much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Ace 4, because it has a back camera with a lot higher resolution and a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution. The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Ace 4, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a way better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Ace 4, because it has a 160% more battery capacity.
The Motorola DROID Turbo costs a bit more money than the Galaxy Ace 4, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.