Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Ace
GT-S5830, GT-S5830I| Global Score | |
| 48.3 | 71.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 2.3, 2.2 | Android 4.0 |
| 2011-01-26 | 0000-00-00 |
| 4.43 x 2.36 x 0.45 inches | 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 3.99 ounces | 4.72 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 100.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.5 inches | 4.8 inches |
| 320 x 480 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 165 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 MSM7227 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| ARM11 (Single-Core 800 MHz) processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| -- | 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 200 (128 MHz) GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 7.11 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 161,79 MB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 2.02 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
| -- | f/2.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 320 x 240 (20 fps) (QVGA) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 5.83 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA |
| SIM | Micro SIM |
| 3.3 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1350mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 640 hours standby time 11 hours talk time | 200 hours standby time 15 hours talk time |
| 3.12 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S III Cricket is a lot better than Galaxy Ace, having a general score of 71.5 against 48.3. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S III Cricket has 4.0 version and Galaxy Ace has Android 2.3 version. Galaxy S III Cricket's construction is much thinner but heavier than Galaxy Ace.
The Galaxy S III Cricket has a better processing power than Galaxy Ace, because it has a higher number of faster cores and a better graphics processing unit running at 400 megahertz. The Galaxy S III Cricket counts with a much more vibrant display than Galaxy Ace, because it has a lot better 1280 x 720 pixels resolution, a way bigger display and a way higher pixels count per inch in the screen.
The Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket counts with a much better storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Ace, because it has 32 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 64 GB. The Galaxy S III Cricket features a very superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Ace, because it has a 56 percent larger battery size.
Galaxy S III Cricket has a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy Ace, because it has a much higher video resolution and a back facing camera with a way higher resolution.
The Galaxy S III Cricket costs the same than Galaxy Ace, making it easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.