Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Alpha
AT&TSM-G850A
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 14 |
| -- | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.21 x 2.58 x 0.26 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 4.06 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold, Gray and White | Black and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 320.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 312 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1860mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 11 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.76 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a general score of 77.8, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy Alpha's global score of 76.3. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has older 14 version and Galaxy Alpha has Android 4.4.4 version. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro's body is incredibly thinner but notably heavier than the Galaxy Alpha.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way better screen than Galaxy Alpha, because it has a lot higher resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels, a way larger display and a greater quantity of pixels per inch of screen. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Alpha, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy Alpha features a much greater processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although they are faster) and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with an additional graphics processing unit. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Alpha, because it has a 5700mAh battery size.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures much better photographs and videos than Galaxy Alpha, because it has a way larger aperture for better low light captures, a camera with a way higher resolution and a way higher video quality.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than Samsung Galaxy Alpha, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Samsung Galaxy Alpha. So if you want that extra features, you can buy vivo X Fold 3 Pro, else you can save some dollars and buy the Samsung Galaxy Alpha, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.