Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Alpha
AT&TSM-G850A
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-04-02 |
| 5.21 x 2.58 x 0.26 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 4.06 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold, Gray and White | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 320.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 312 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1860mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 11 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.76 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X60 Pro has a general score of 78.8, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy Alpha's 76.3 global score. Both of these devices include Android OS (operating system), but vivo X60 Pro has 11 version while Galaxy Alpha has Android 4.4.4. Although it's the best we are comparing, vivo X60 Pro's construction is thicker and much heavier than Galaxy Alpha.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy Alpha, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory and a greater number of faster cores. The Galaxy Alpha has a little bit better looking display than vivo X60 Pro, although it has a way lower 1280 x 720 resolution, a little bit worse pixels count per display inch and a way smaller screen.
Vivo X60 Pro features a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Alpha, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the vivo X60 Pro also has higher 60 fps video frame rates, a back camera with way more mega pixels and a larger aperture to take better low-light images and video.
The vivo X60 Pro features a very superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy Alpha, because it has 256 GB internal memory. The vivo X60 Pro counts with a much longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Alpha, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity instead of 1860mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.