Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 68.7 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-07-09 | 2017-10-19 |
| 5.62 x 2.76 x 0.35 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 130.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T720 MP1 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.04 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 has a global score of 81.6, which is much better than Galaxy Amp Prime 3's 68.7 general score. The Google Pixel 2 is a somewhat thinner and just a little bit lighter phone than the Galaxy Amp Prime 3, even when both were only released 9 months apart. Google Pixel 2 has a more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Amp Prime 3, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and more cores.
The Google Pixel 2 counts with a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Amp Prime 3, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Google Pixel 2 also has a greater amount of pixels per inch of screen and a way higher 1080 x 1920 resolution. The Google Pixel 2 captures better pictures and videos than Galaxy Amp Prime 3, because it has a bigger camera aperture, a much more mega pixels back-facing camera, a much higher video definition and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Google Pixel 2 features a very superior storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Amp Prime 3, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal memory. Google Pixel 2 counts with a bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Amp Prime 3, because it has a 4% larger battery capacity.
Google Pixel 2 is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.