Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 68.7 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2018-07-09 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.62 x 2.76 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Blue |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 130.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-T720 MP1 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.04 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo has a global score of 77.9, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy Amp Prime 3's global score of 68.7. Despite being the best we compare here, we must tell that it's also an extremely older, thicker and somewhat heavier cellphone. Both devices in this comparison come with Android operating system, but Motorola DROID Turbo has the previous 4.4.4 version while Samsung Galaxy Amp Prime 3 has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a much sharper screen than Galaxy Amp Prime 3, because it has a way higher 2560 x 1440 resolution, a quite bigger screen and a way greater pixel amount per display inch. The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a quite better performance than Galaxy Amp Prime 3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola DROID Turbo also has an extra graphics processing unit and more RAM memory.
The Galaxy Amp Prime 3 counts with just a bit more storage to install applications and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has just 16 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows up to 400 GB. The Motorola DROID Turbo features a superior battery duration than Galaxy Amp Prime 3, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity against 2600mAh.
The Motorola DROID Turbo features a much better camera than Galaxy Amp Prime 3, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for capturing pictures and/or video in low light environments, it also counts with a lot better video quality and a much better 20.7 megapixels resolution camera in the back.
The Motorola DROID Turbo costs a bit more money than Samsung Galaxy Amp Prime 3, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.