Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Beam
I8530Samsung Galaxy Ace 3
LTEGT-S7275
| Global Score | |
| 58.7 | 62.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 2.3.6 | Android 4.2.2 |
| 2012-02-26 | 2013-06-10 |
| 4.88 x 2.53 x 0.49 inches | 4.77 x 2.47 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.13 ounces | 4.22 ounces |
| -- | Black |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 120.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 4 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 480 x 800 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| 233 pixels per inch | 233 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.1 | 7.6 |
| Performance | |
| ST-Ericsson NovaThor U8500 chipset | Broadcom BCM21664 chipset |
| Dual-Core 1000 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A9 (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor |
| 768 MB RAM | 1 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 (500 MHz) GPU | Broadcom VideoCore IV (250 MHz) GPU |
| 7.92 | 8.01 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 8 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.62 | 5.06 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution |
| 6.82 | 6.71 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 3.6 | 5.9 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 8 hours talk time |
| 3.92 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 has a score of 62.2, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Beam's 58.7 general score. The Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 body is newer, noticeably thinner and somewhat lighter than Samsung Galaxy Beam. Both devices in our current comparison have Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 has 4.2.2 version and Samsung Galaxy Beam has Android 2.3.6, counting with some nice extra features and optimized performance.
The Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 has a little sharper screen than Galaxy Beam. They have a display of the same size, a higher pixel number in each inch of screen and exactly the same resolution of 800 x 480px. Galaxy Ace 3 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy Beam, because although it has a worse graphics co-processor running at 250 megahertz, and they both have a Dual-Core CPU, the Galaxy Ace 3 also counts with 256 MB more RAM.
Galaxy Beam takes a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy Ace 3. They have the same 1280x720 (HD) video resolution, the same 30 fps video frame rates and a same resolution back-facing camera. The Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 has just a bit bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Beam, and although they both have equal 8 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 also has a SD extension slot that supports up to 64 GB.
Samsung Galaxy Beam counts with just a bit better battery life than Galaxy Ace 3, because it has 2000mAh of battery capacity instead of 1800mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.