Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-06-01 | 2018-09-21 |
| 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.26 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone XS Max has a global score of 84.5, which is much better than Galaxy C5's 76.4 score. IPhone XS Max's design is newer than the Galaxy C5's, although it is somewhat thicker and way heavier. The iPhone XS Max has a much better display than Galaxy C5, because it has a bigger display, a higher 1242 x 2688 resolution and a quite greater display density.
Apple iPhone XS Max counts with a faster CPU than Galaxy C5, because although it has 2 lesser processing cores , and they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Apple iPhone XS Max also counts with a 64 bits CPU. The iPhone XS Max counts with a much better camera than Galaxy C5, because although it has a camera with way less MP resolution, it also counts with a much better (4K) video resolution and a bigger camera aperture for better low light photos.
The Galaxy C5 has a superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than iPhone XS Max, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy C5 also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 128 GB. Apple iPhone XS Max has superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy C5, because it has a 22 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.