Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2016-06-01 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.26 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy C5, having a score of 81.2 against 76.4. LG V40 ThinQ's design is incredibly newer, but somewhat thicker and heavier than the Samsung Galaxy C5. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS, but LG V40 ThinQ has the older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy C5 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy C5, because it has a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px, a bigger display and more pixels per inch of display. LG V40 ThinQ counts with a very superior storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy C5, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the LG V40 ThinQ also has an external memory card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a quite superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy C5, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM. LG V40 ThinQ has a much better camera than Galaxy C5, because although it has a lot lower 12 MP resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a way better (4K) video quality and a lot bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light captures and video.
The LG V40 ThinQ has improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy C5, because it has a 27 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.