Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2016-06-01 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.26 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Blue |
| Metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo is a bit better than the Galaxy C5, with a overall score of 77.9 against 76.4. The Motorola DROID Turbo is better than Galaxy C5, we must highlight that it is also older, heavier and a lot thicker. These phones include Android operating system, but the Motorola DROID Turbo has 4.4.4 version while Galaxy C5 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
The Motorola DROID Turbo features a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy C5, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and less cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a graphics co-processor. Motorola DROID Turbo features a much sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy C5, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Motorola DROID Turbo also has more pixels per inch of display and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy C5 has a much better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy C5 also has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 128 GB. The Motorola DROID Turbo captures slightly better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy C5, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low light captures and video, it also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution and a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Motorola DROID Turbo has a superior battery duration than Galaxy C5, because it has a 50 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.