Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-06-01 | 2020-06-19 |
| 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.26 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is a lot better than the Samsung Galaxy C5, having a score of 91.8 against 76.4. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has the previous 11 version and Samsung Galaxy C5 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G's body is incredibly newer, but notably heavier and somewhat thicker than Samsung Galaxy C5.
The Galaxy A71 5G features a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy C5, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a bigger display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400px resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a very superior storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy C5, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy A71 5G has just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy C5, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G shoots much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy C5, because it has a way higher (4K) video resolution, a camera with a way higher 64 MP resolution and a larger aperture to take better images in low light situations.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a much better battery duration than Galaxy C5, because it has a 73 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.