Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-06-01 | 2018-08-24 |
| 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.26 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note9 has an overall score of 87.1, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy C5's overall score of 76.4. The Samsung Galaxy Note9 body is much newer, but way thicker and incredibly heavier than Samsung Galaxy C5. The Galaxy Note9 counts with a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy C5, because it has a little higher screen pixels density, a bigger display and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 has a superior storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy C5, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB and 64 GB more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy Note9 features a better processor than Galaxy C5, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Note9 also has more RAM.
Galaxy Note9 has a way better battery duration than Galaxy C5, because it has a 4000mAh battery size. The Samsung Galaxy Note9 captures better videos and photos than Galaxy C5, because although it has a back-facing camera with a lot lower 12 mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a lot bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.