Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 5.1 |
| 2016-06-01 | 2015-08-13 |
| 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.26 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Metal | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 8.73 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 4.56 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S6 edge+ is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy C5, getting a score of 79.3 against 76.4. Despite being the best device in this review, the Galaxy S6 edge+ is an older, a little thicker and just a bit heavier device than the Samsung Galaxy C5. These devices have Android operating system, but the Galaxy S6 edge+ has older 5.1 version while Samsung Galaxy C5 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ features a more vivid screen than Galaxy C5, because it has a just a little greater screen density, a bit larger display and a higher 2560 x 1440px resolution. Samsung Galaxy C5 has a much greater memory to install applications and games than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy C5 also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 128 GB.
The Galaxy C5 counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Galaxy C5 also has a higher number of cores (although slower). Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ takes slightly better pictures and videos than Galaxy C5, and although they both have a same size aperture and a camera in the back with a 16 MP resolution, the Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ also has a way better 3840x2160 video resolution.
Galaxy S6 edge+ has a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy C5, because it has a 15 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.