Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2016-06-01 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.26 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Metal | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is just a bit better than Galaxy C5, with a global score of 77.8 against 76.4. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android operating system, but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has the previous 14 version and Galaxy C5 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is much heavier than Galaxy C5, it's way thinner and also incredibly newer.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a lot better looking screen than Galaxy C5, because although it has a bit inferior pixels quantity per screen inch, it also counts with a way higher 2200 x 2480 resolution and a way larger display. The Galaxy C5 features a lot better performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy C5, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy C5, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy C5, because it has a larger camera aperture, a camera with a lot higher 50 MP resolution and a much higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.