Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.4 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2017-04-07 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.16 x 3.04 x 0.28 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Blue and Gold | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone 8 has a score of 85, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro's 78.4 global score. IPhone 8's body is a bit thicker but somewhat lighter than the Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, and they were released only a few months apart. The Apple iPhone 8 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy C7 Pro, although it has a little bit less pixels per inch of screen, a little bit smaller display and a lot worse 750 x 1334 resolution.
IPhone 8 has a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Apple iPhone 8 features a bit superior processor than Galaxy C7 Pro, because although it has 2 GB less RAM memory and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
The iPhone 8 has a bit better camera than Galaxy C7 Pro, because although it has a back-facing camera with much less megapixels resolution, it also counts with a lot better (4K) video quality and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better captures in low light environments. The Galaxy C7 Pro has a much better battery performance than iPhone 8, because it has an 81 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.