Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.4 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2017-04-07 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.16 x 3.04 x 0.28 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Blue and Gold | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XS Max is a little bit better than the Galaxy C7 Pro, with a global score of 84.5 against 78.4. Apple iPhone XS Max's construction is newer than Galaxy C7 Pro's, but it's just a little bit thicker and heavier. The iPhone XS Max counts with a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has a little more pixels per inch of display, a bit bigger screen and a better resolution of 1242 x 2688.
The iPhone XS Max has a superior processor than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although they are faster), and they both have the same RAM amount, the iPhone XS Max also counts with a 64-bit CPU. The iPhone XS Max captures just a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, because although it has a lot less megapixels camera, it also counts with a larger aperture for better low light photography and a way higher 3840x2160 video quality.
Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro features much more storage capacity to install applications and games than iPhone XS Max, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro also has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB. Galaxy C7 Pro counts with a bit better battery life than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has a 4 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.