Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.4 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-04-07 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.16 x 3.04 x 0.28 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue and Gold | Aurora black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, with a score of 83.7 against 78.4. Both devices we compare here come with Android operating system, but LG V50 ThinQ has an older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. LG V50 ThinQ is a noticeably newer cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, but it's somewhat thicker and a bit heavier.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has a bit bigger screen, more pixels per inch of screen and a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px. LG V50 ThinQ has a little better processing power than Galaxy C7 Pro, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a better camera than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, because although it has a back-facing camera with much less megapixels resolution, it also counts with a lot bigger camera aperture to take better low light captures and a much higher 3840x2160 video quality. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has an external memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB and 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
LG V50 ThinQ features better battery duration than Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has a 21% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.