Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.4 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2017-04-07 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.16 x 3.04 x 0.28 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Blue and Gold | Black and White |
| Metal | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro is just a bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, with a overall score of 78.4 against 77.8. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro has a newer 6.0 Marshmallow version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version, so it offers a couple additional features and increased performance. Although Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro is way older and extremely thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's design is still extremely lighter.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has a much better 2200 x 2480px resolution, a really larger screen and a just a little more pixels per inch of display. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a very superior storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy C7 Pro, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy C7 Pro counts with a really superior performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 12 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has a back camera with lot more megapixels, a larger camera aperture and a lot better video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.