Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-06-01 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.17 x 3.04 x 0.27 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Pink | Aurora black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy C7, with a general score of 83.7 against 77.7. These phones include Android operating system, but the LG V50 ThinQ has the older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy C7 has Android 8.0 Oreo version. The LG V50 ThinQ design is newer than the Samsung Galaxy C7's, although it's just a bit heavier and thicker.
LG V50 ThinQ features a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy C7, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a brighter display than Galaxy C7, because it has a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3120px, a little larger screen and a higher pixel quantity per inch in the screen.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy C7, because although it has a lot less megapixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a way larger diafragm aperture to take better low light captures and videos and a way higher 3840x2160 video resolution. LG V50 ThinQ features a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy C7, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V50 ThinQ has superior battery duration than Galaxy C7, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.