Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2016-06-01 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.17 x 3.04 x 0.27 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Pink | Black and Blue |
| Metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.9 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo has a score of 77.9, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy C7's score of 77.7. Even being the best cellphone in this comparison review, Motorola DROID Turbo's body is older, just a bit heavier and thicker than the Samsung Galaxy C7. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but Motorola DROID Turbo has older 4.4.4 version and Samsung Galaxy C7 has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Motorola DROID Turbo features a way better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy C7, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels density and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px. Galaxy C7 features a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy C7 also has a SD memory slot that allows up to 128 GB.
The Motorola DROID Turbo features a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy C7, because although it has a lower number of cores (but faster) and 1 GB less RAM, it also counts with a graphics co-processor. The Motorola DROID Turbo features better battery performance than Galaxy C7, because it has a 3900mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh.
The Motorola DROID Turbo features a little bit better camera than Galaxy C7, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for low light photography and video, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a camera with much more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.