Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2016-06-01 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.17 x 3.04 x 0.27 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Pink | Black and White |
| Metal | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a little bit better than the Galaxy C7, having a general score of 77.8 against 77.7. These devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has an older 14 version while Galaxy C7 has Android 8.0 Oreo. Even though the vivo X Fold 3 Pro is incredibly heavier than the Galaxy C7, it's thinner and also incredibly newer.
Samsung Galaxy C7 counts with a much better processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much more vibrant display than Galaxy C7, because it has a much bigger display, a bit higher quantity of pixels in each inch in the display and a lot higher 2200 x 2480 pixels resolution.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy C7, because it has a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera, a way better video resolution and a bigger aperture to take better low light photos. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much bigger memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy C7, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy C7, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.