Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2017-02-24 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max is a bit better than Galaxy C9 Pro, getting an 85.3 score against 81. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max is a extremely newer phone than the Galaxy C9 Pro, but it's thicker and heavier. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max has iOS 15.x OS, and Galaxy C9 Pro counts with Android 6.0 Marshmallow OS.
The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max has a brighter display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a higher 1242 x 2688 pixels resolution, a little bit bigger screen and a little bit more pixels per inch in the screen. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max features a quite better hardware performance than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has less RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a superior storage capacity for games and applications than iPhone 11 Pro Max, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Galaxy C9 Pro also has a SD card slot that admits up to 256 GB. The iPhone 11 Pro Max captures much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a back-facing camera with way less megapixels resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better low light photography and videos and a way better video resolution.
IPhone 11 Pro Max's battery lifetime is very similar to Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro's battery lifetime, although the iPhone 11 Pro Max has just 3969mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.