Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 93.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | iOS 15.x |
| 2017-02-24 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro has a score of 93.3, which is much better than Galaxy C9 Pro's 81 overall score. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro construction is incredibly newer than the Galaxy C9 Pro's, although it's just a little thicker and just a bit heavier. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro comes with iOS 15.x operating system, and Galaxy C9 Pro comes with Android 6.0 Marshmallow operating system.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro features a better processing power than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has an inferior number of cores , and they both have a 6 GB RAM, the Apple iPhone 13 Pro also counts with a 64 bits processor. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro features a much sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a quite larger display, a better resolution of 1170 x 2532px and a bit more pixels per display inch.
The iPhone 13 Pro features a bit better camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a back facing camera with a much lower resolution, it also counts with a lot bigger camera aperture and a lot better (4K) video quality. The Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a slightly better storage capacity to install games and applications than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 256 GB.
Galaxy C9 Pro has greater battery life than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, because it has a 29 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.