Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | iOS 15.x |
| 2017-02-24 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has an overall score of 93.2, which is much better than Galaxy C9 Pro's score of 81. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max body is notably newer than Galaxy C9 Pro's, although it's much heavier and just a little bit thicker. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max comes with iOS 15.x OS, while Galaxy C9 Pro counts with Android 6.0 Marshmallow OS.
IPhone 13 Pro Max features a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a little bit higher display density, a little bit bigger display and a better 1284 x 2778 resolution. The iPhone 13 Pro Max has a superior CPU than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has 2 lesser processing cores (although they are faster), and they both have the same RAM amount, the iPhone 13 Pro Max also counts with a 64-bits processor.
IPhone 13 Pro Max captures a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a much lower resolution camera, it also counts with a lot higher (4K) video resolution and a way bigger aperture for better images and video in low light situations. Galaxy C9 Pro features a bit bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds up to 256 GB.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with just a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 4352mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.