Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | iOS 9.x |
| 2017-02-24 | 2015-09-09 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Metal | Aluminium, Glass and Steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 575.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 750 x 1334 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Apple A9 APL0898 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | 64-bit Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 2 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | PowerVR GT7600 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 29.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.9 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 1715mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 240 hours standby time 14 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 3.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 6s has a global score of 83, which is slightly better than the Galaxy C9 Pro's global score of 81. Apple iPhone 6s's design is much lighter than Galaxy C9 Pro, although it's a bit thicker and was released about a year before. The Apple iPhone 6s comes with iOS 9.x operating system, while Galaxy C9 Pro comes with Android 6.0 Marshmallow operating system.
The iPhone 6s features a brighter display than Galaxy C9 Pro, although it has a lot worse 1334 x 750 resolution, a little lower screen pixel density and a lot smaller display. The iPhone 6s features just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a lower number of slower cores and lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a graphics processing unit and a 64-bits processor.
Galaxy C9 Pro features a bit more memory for games and applications than iPhone 6s, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 256 GB. The Galaxy C9 Pro features a much better battery duration than Apple iPhone 6s, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
The iPhone 6s captures a little bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a lot lower resolution camera and a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a lot better (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.