Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2017-02-24 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Silver and Space gray |
| Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X is a bit better than Galaxy C9 Pro, with an 88.1 score against 81. Even though the Apple iPhone X and the Galaxy C9 Pro were only released 8 months apart, Apple iPhone X's construction is a bit thicker but also a bit lighter than the Galaxy C9 Pro. The iPhone X has a better CPU than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a lower number of cores and less RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
The iPhone X features a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a slightly better 1125 x 2436 resolution. IPhone X captures a little bit better photos and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a much less mega pixels resolution camera, it also counts with a larger aperture for better low light captures and a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition.
The iPhone X has a much bigger memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy C9 Pro has a superior battery performance than iPhone X, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2716mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.