Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2017-02-24 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone XR has a general score of 82, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro's overall score of 81. The iPhone XR is a newer cellphone than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, although it's thicker and a bit heavier. The iPhone XR has a quite superior performance than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has 2 less cores and 3 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
The Apple iPhone XR features a little sharper screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a bit worse 828 x 1792px resolution and a bit worse pixel amount per inch of screen, it also counts with a little bit larger display. The iPhone XR counts with a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a back facing camera with a much worse 12 MP resolution, it also counts with a much better (4K) video quality and a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light photography and videos.
The Galaxy C9 Pro has a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Apple iPhone XR, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Galaxy C9 Pro also has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB. The Galaxy C9 Pro features greater battery performance than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a 36 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.