Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2017-02-24 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XS is a little bit better than the Galaxy C9 Pro, with a global score of 84.2 against 81. Although the Apple iPhone XS is just a little bit thicker than Galaxy C9 Pro, it's just a little lighter and also newer. The iPhone XS counts with a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater screen pixels density and a bit higher resolution of 1125 x 2436.
The iPhone XS has a superior processor than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although they are faster) and lesser RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU. The iPhone XS captures just a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a lot less megapixels camera, it also counts with a larger aperture for better low light photography and a way higher 3840x2160 video quality.
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro features much more storage capacity to install applications and games than iPhone XS, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro also has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB. Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a much better battery life than Apple iPhone XS, because it has a 50 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.