Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 5.1, 5.0 |
| 2017-02-24 | 2014-10-15 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.27 x 3.27 x 0.40 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Blue and White |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1019.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 490 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.8 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3220mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 330 hours standby time 24 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6 is a little bit better than Galaxy C9 Pro, having a overall score of 81.1 against 81. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Google Nexus 6 has 5.1 version and Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version. The Google Nexus 6 body is just a little lighter than the Galaxy C9 Pro, but it's extremely thicker and was released 2 years before.
The Google Nexus 6 features a little faster processing unit than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and less CPU cores (although they are faster), it also counts with an additional graphics processing unit. The Google Nexus 6 features a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a same size screen, the Google Nexus 6 also has a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and more pixels per inch in the display.
Google Nexus 6 counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a back facing camera with a worse 13 megapixels resolution and a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video quality. Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a superior storage to install applications and games than Google Nexus 6, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy C9 Pro also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 256 GB.
The Galaxy C9 Pro counts with superior battery life than Google Nexus 6, because it has a 24 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.