Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2017-02-24 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Black, Gray and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy C9 Pro is just a bit better than the Google Pixel, having a overall score of 81 against 80.2. Even though Galaxy C9 Pro and Google Pixel were released only a couple of months apart, Galaxy C9 Pro's body is much thinner but heavier. The Google Pixel counts with just a bit better looking display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have an equal 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution, the Google Pixel also counts with a just a little higher pixels count per inch in the display.
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro features a bit faster CPU than Google Pixel, because it has 2 GB more RAM and 4 more cpu cores (although they are slower). The Google Pixel features a little bit better camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture and a lot less MP resolution camera, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a little bit better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB. Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a superior battery performance than Google Pixel, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.