Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2017-02-24 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Black, Pink and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy C9 Pro is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 3, getting an 81 score against 80. The Galaxy C9 Pro is an older and incredibly heavier cellphone than Google Pixel 3, but Samsung could make it thinner anyway. Google Pixel 3 counts with a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little greater screen density and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2160.
Google Pixel 3 counts with just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Google Pixel 3 shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a back camera with a way worse resolution, it also counts with a much better (4K) video quality and a bigger diafragm aperture.
The Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy C9 Pro also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB. The Galaxy C9 Pro features a superior battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.