Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2017-02-24 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Black, Pink and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy C9 Pro has an overall score of 81, which is a little bit better than Google Pixel 3 XL's overall score of 80.7. The Galaxy C9 Pro construction is somewhat thinner than the Google Pixel 3 XL, although it is just a bit heavier and was released around a year before. The Google Pixel 3 XL has a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a lot better 1440 x 2960px resolution, a little bigger screen and a greater pixel count per inch in the display.
Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage, the Galaxy C9 Pro also has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 256 GB. The Google Pixel 3 XL has just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy C9 Pro features a little better battery life than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3430mAh. The Google Pixel 3 XL takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a way less mega-pixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a much higher (4K) video definition and a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light photography.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.