Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-02-24 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Black, Purple and White |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a general score of 81, which is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 3a's general score of 78.8. Despite of the fact the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is extremely older and way heavier than the Google Pixel 3a, it's design is still thinner. Both of these devices work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has 6.0 Marshmallow version while Google Pixel 3a has Android 11.
Google Pixel 3a features a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a bit greater pixel count in each inch of display and a little bit higher 1080 x 2220 pixels resolution. Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro features a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro also has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro and the Google Pixel 3a both count with really similar processors, and although the Google Pixel 3a has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro counts with greater battery life than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 3a counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a lot lower 12.2 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a bigger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.