Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-02-24 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Black, Purple and White |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is slightly better than the Google Pixel 3a XL, getting a score of 81 against 78.9. Both of these devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has the newer 6.0 Marshmallow version while Google Pixel 3a XL has Android 11, so it counts with a couple nice extra features. Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is an a lot older and heavier phone than the Google Pixel 3a XL, but Samsung managed to make it somewhat thinner anyway.
The Google Pixel 3a XL counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Google Pixel 3a XL also has a slightly higher 1080 x 2160 resolution and a bit better pixel amount in each inch of screen. The Galaxy C9 Pro has a very superior memory for applications and games than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy C9 Pro also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 256 GB.
The Google Pixel 3a XL features a processing unit that's very similar to the processor in Galaxy C9 Pro, and although the Google Pixel 3a XL has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. Google Pixel 3a XL takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a camera with a way worse 12.2 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger camera aperture and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro counts with just a bit better battery life than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has an 8 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.