Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2017-02-24 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 is slightly better than the Galaxy C9 Pro, having a global score of 81.9 against 81. Google Pixel 4 is a a lot newer and somewhat lighter cellphone than Galaxy C9 Pro, although it's also thicker. The Google Pixel 4 has just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro. They have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM amount.
Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2280 resolution and a just a bit greater count of pixels per display inch. The Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a much greater storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy C9 Pro also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 256 GB.
Google Pixel 4 shoots clearer photos and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a back camera with much less mega pixels, it also counts with a larger aperture and a much higher (4K) video quality. The Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a superior battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.