Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-02-24 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Just black |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a is a bit better than the Galaxy C9 Pro, having an 82.9 score against 81. Both of these devices include Android OS, but the Google Pixel 4a has 11 version while Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. Although the Google Pixel 4a is thicker than the Galaxy C9 Pro, it's noticeably lighter and notably newer.
The Google Pixel 4a features a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy C9 Pro. Both of them have the same number of cores and 6 GB of RAM memory. Google Pixel 4a has a slightly better screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2340px resolution and a just a little higher pixels density.
Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a little bit more storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds up to 256 GB. Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro counts with better battery performance than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 27 percent larger battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 4a has a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a lot lower resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a much better video definition and a bigger aperture for better images and videos in poorly lited environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.