Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2017-02-24 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Clearly white and Just black |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has an overall score of 87.5, which is a little bit better than Galaxy C9 Pro's score of 81. Google Pixel 4a 5G's body is way newer and lighter, but thicker than the Galaxy C9 Pro. Both phones in our current comparison use Android operating system, but Google Pixel 4a 5G has the older 11 version while Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy C9 Pro. Both of them have 6 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit. Google Pixel 4a 5G features a slightly better screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a just a bit better pixels density, a little larger screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2340px resolution.
The Galaxy C9 Pro counts with slightly more memory capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows up to 256 GB. The Google Pixel 4a 5G takes much better videos and photos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a way less megapixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a way higher video definition and a bigger aperture to capture better low-light photos and videos.
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro features a little longer battery duration than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3885mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.