Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2017-02-24 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Metal | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 is just a bit better than the Galaxy C9 Pro, having an 89 score against 81. Even though Google Pixel 5 is somewhat thicker than the Galaxy C9 Pro, it's lighter and also much newer. The Google Pixel 5 features a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Google Pixel 5 also has a just a little higher count of pixels per inch in the screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340.
The Google Pixel 5 has a little better processing power than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a little bit better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 256 GB.
Google Pixel 5 counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 2% greater battery size. The Google Pixel 5 has a superior camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a back camera with a much worse 12.2 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better low-light photography and videos and a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.