Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2017-02-24 | 2021-06-25 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black |
| Metal | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2676 x 1236 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 440 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 17.00mm focal length |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy C9 Pro has a global score of 81, which is a bit better than Honor 50 Pro's 77 score. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android operating system, but Galaxy C9 Pro has the newer 6.0 Marshmallow version and Honor 50 Pro has Android 11, so it provides you a couple nice extra features and performance tweaks. Despite of the fact the Galaxy C9 Pro is noticeably older and just a little bit heavier than Honor 50 Pro, it's design is still thinner.
The Honor 50 Pro counts with a little faster processing unit than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Honor 50 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Honor 50 Pro has a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a just a little better quantity of pixels per inch of display, a bit bigger screen and a better resolution of 1236 x 2676 pixels.
The Honor 50 Pro shoots much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Honor 50 Pro also has a lot higher video definition and a camera with much more MP. Honor 50 Pro features a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
The Honor 50 Pro counts with a battery lifetime that's just as good as the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.