Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 92.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2017-02-24 | 2024-03-22 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 8.36 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Agate Grey and Frozen Berry |
| Metal | Glass and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1389.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LTPO |
| 367 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| -- | 5000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 10.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 24 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 1 TB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 23.2 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is much better than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, getting a score of 92.1 against 81. Although Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is extremely newer than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, it's incredibly thicker and noticeably heavier. These devices use Android operating system, but Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has 14 version and Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a much more vibrant display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen, a bit bigger display and a better 1280 x 2800px resolution. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 1 TB internal memory capacity.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a greater performance than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a very superior battery duration than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 40% greater battery capacity.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a camera in the back with a much higher resolution, a way bigger aperture to take better low-light photos and a much better (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.