Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 5.0 |
| 2017-02-24 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Metal | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 367 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is just a bit better than HTC One M9, with a score of 81 against 77.7. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a newer 6.0 Marshmallow version and HTC One M9 has Android 5.0 version. Even though the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is somewhat heavier than the HTC One M9, it's notably thinner and newer.
HTC One M9 has a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has 3 GB lesser RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64-bits CPU and an extra GPU. The HTC One M9 features a sharper display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1920 x 1080px, the HTC One M9 also counts with a bit better display density.
The Galaxy C9 Pro features a much bigger storage for applications and games than HTC One M9, because it has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 256 GB and 64 GB internal storage capacity. HTC One M9 takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for taking photographs and/or video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video resolution and a better 20 megapixels resolution back camera.
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a really longer battery life than HTC One M9, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.