Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2017-02-24 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black and Gold | 16 777 216 |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 367 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy C9 Pro has a global score of 81, which is a bit better than HTC U Ultra's 77 global score. The Galaxy C9 Pro construction is a bit heavier but somewhat thinner than the HTC U Ultra, and both were only released with a couple months difference. HTC U Ultra has a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher number of pixels per screen inch and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Galaxy C9 Pro features a bit more powerful processor than HTC U Ultra, because it has more RAM and a larger number of cores. HTC U Ultra features a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a way lower resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a larger aperture and a way higher video resolution.
HTC U Ultra features a way bigger memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the HTC U Ultra also has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy C9 Pro features improved battery duration than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.