Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2017-02-24 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Metal | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 367 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy C9 Pro is a bit better than the HTC U11, with a general score of 81 against 77.6. Even though the Galaxy C9 Pro and HTC U11 were only released 3 months apart, the Galaxy C9 Pro design is somewhat thinner but also heavier than HTC U11. HTC U11 counts with just a bit better processing power than Galaxy C9 Pro, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
HTC U11 has a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560. The Galaxy C9 Pro has a slightly better storage to install games and applications than HTC U11, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy C9 Pro also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro counts with better battery lifetime than HTC U11, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh. HTC U11 shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a camera in the back with lot less mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture and a way higher (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.