Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2017-02-24 | 2016-03-31 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 5.88 x 2.91 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Black and Gold | 16 777 216 |
| Metal | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 499.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 554 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is a little bit better than the LG G5, having an 81 score against 76.1. The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is a newer and just a bit thinner phone than LG G5, although it is heavier. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has the older 6.0 Marshmallow version and LG G5 has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Galaxy C9 Pro features a bit superior CPU than LG G5, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and 4 more CPU cores (although slower). The LG G5 has a brighter screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much greater display density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
The LG G5 counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a same resolution camera, the LG G5 also has a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light photos and video and a much better 3840x2160 video quality. The LG G5 counts with a better memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a superior battery life than LG G5, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.