Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2017-02-24 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G7 ThinQ has a global score of 81, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy C9 Pro's 81 score. Both devices we compare here use Android OS (operating system), but the LG G7 ThinQ has a newer 9.0 Pie version and Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. The LG G7 ThinQ is a newer and somewhat lighter phone than the Galaxy C9 Pro, although it's thicker.
The LG G7 ThinQ features a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a way better resolution of 1440 x 3120px, a much greater pixels density and a quite bigger display. LG G7 ThinQ has a much greater storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the LG G7 ThinQ also has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG G7 ThinQ has just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy C9 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. The LG G7 ThinQ features a better camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a 16 megapixels back facing camera, the LG G7 ThinQ also has a much higher video resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light images.
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro features improved battery performance than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.